<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=502551789&amp;fmt=gif">
Skip to content
Xeneta Press Releases

Major carrier reverses decision on Red Sea return – analysts warn unpredictability could be toxic for ocean container supply chains

OSLO, Norway – 20 January, 2026

CMA CGM has announced its FAL1, FAL3 and MEX services connecting Asia and Europe, which recently began transiting Suez Canal again on backhaul voyages, will return to sailing around the Cape of Good Hope.

CMA CGM cited the "the complex and uncertain international context” in reversing its decision to return to the Red Sea.

Destine Ozuygur, Senior Market Analyst at Xeneta - the ocean and air freight intelligence platform, said: “Shippers crave predictability in supply chains. Carriers taking the decision to return to the Red Sea then reversing that decision - even if it is done for important safety reasons - still risks undermining confidence in schedule reliability and eroding trust in partnerships.”

Latest data from Xeneta shows full loop transit times on the FAL1 service - connecting China and Singapore to six European ports including two dedicated calls to Southampton - decreased from 105 days to 98 when ships began transiting Suez Canal again. It also saw one vessel slot removed.

Ozuygur said: “Unpredictability is toxic for supply chains.  Shippers want certainty over when containers arrive at port, even if that means longer transit times around Cape of Good Hope.

“Ironically, CMA CGM’s decision to play it safe and return services via Cape of Good Hope may lead shippers to perceive them as the riskier choice against their peers.

“What if a shipper paid a higher freight rate for the FAL1 or MEX service due to faster transit times through the Suez Canal, only to find shipments are moved back a week?

“There is also irony in CMA CGM – previously the most pro-active major carrier in returning the Red Sea - taking a backward step just a few days after Maersk - generally the most risk averse carrier - announcing its MECL service will begin transiting Suez Canal again. It typifies the unpredictability shippers must deal with.”

Ozuygur warns this unpredictability could spread across services and carriers. This includes CMA CGM INDAMEX service, which is currently still scheduled to transit Suez Canal on fronthaul and backhaul legs.

Xeneta data shows transit time from Port Qasim in Karachi to New York on the INDAMEX fell from 40 days to 36 days after returning to the Suez Canal in January.

Ozuygur said: “There has not been a CMA CGM announcement on the INDAMEX service, but shippers will look at the decision on FAL and MEX services and fear containers will be arriving later than planned. Do shippers plan for a transit time of 40 days or 36 days? What impact does this have on warehousing or detention and demurrage fees?

“Multiply this uncertainty across all services and carriers and the risk of widespread disruption becomes clear.”

Ends